Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove Expired Link on Access #1361

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 9, 2020
Merged

Remove Expired Link on Access #1361

merged 5 commits into from
Dec 9, 2020

Conversation

refs
Copy link
Member

@refs refs commented Dec 8, 2020

@labkode this is a rework of #959 with a little twist. Instead of doing this on the service layer, as you recommended, I'd rather leave the manager handle deletion. This can come in handy in the future if we decide to introduce work queues to do some async jobs.

@refs refs requested a review from labkode as a code owner December 8, 2020 12:06
@update-docs
Copy link

update-docs bot commented Dec 8, 2020

Thanks for opening this pull request! The maintainers of this repository would appreciate it if you would create a changelog item based on your changes.

@refs
Copy link
Member Author

refs commented Dec 8, 2020

I kind of prefer this approach instead of letting the service layer handle deleted public shares. It could spare quite a few API calls with the added cost that new public share managers implementations have to be aware of this logic. But also there is less magic.

I'm in favor of services just calling the implementation instead of modifying behavior.

@refs refs requested a review from ishank011 December 9, 2020 09:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants